(Meta) AMA call retrospective. What was good, what to improve moving forward

[bitn8]

@Kamil

The scope of future calls should be more narrow: either discussing on a high level, or going deep but focusing only on a specific part of Anchor (depositing/borrowing/tokenomics/marketing/engineering).

I agree. I think this one was so long because there was a lot that needed to be covered as it was the first one we have ever done.

@Kamil

I’m thinking a good format would be a quarterly high-level review call, with more narrowly-focused chats organized in between.

Again. I agree. I would propose something similar:

1. Monthly/bi-monthly calls similar to this one with a higher level that explores what TFL is working on with time for questions and input from the community.
2. Twitter spaces on topic-centric forum posts, ideally less formal tone and more exploratory nature once every 2-3 weeks.

@Kamil

A final note: this call happened largely because I volunteered, did a lot of prep work, coordinating, scheduling, moderating and the debrief now. It was really fun, but objectively speaking it’s hard to promise that I’ll be able to keep doing that regularly - day to day I run a business on top of Anchor but on these governance calls I’m just a fan.

You did a wonderful job and certainly set a high standard for community work. Could not thank you enough

Going forward, my thought is to turn this work over to a future Anchor Gov board that starts taking control of this. Community remembers elected to the board would get paid in ANC from the community fund to help organize and be involved under this model. Ideally to keep things balanced and synchronistic there would be TFL members on the board as well. There is a separate post about this - Community dev contribution - #7 by bitn8

Thanks again for all your hard work and time!