# Dynamic Anchor Earn Rate

**URL:** <https://forum.anchorprotocol.com/t/dynamic-anchor-earn-rate/3042>\
**Category:** Mechanism\
**Created:** [March 1, 2022, 11:08pm UTC](https://forum.anchorprotocol.com/t/dynamic-anchor-earn-rate/3042 "2022-03-01T23:08:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 63

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ryanology045](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.anchorprotocol.com/ryanology045/32/14_2.png) [@ryanology045](https://forum.anchorprotocol.com/u/ryanology045)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2022, 9:50am UTC](https://forum.anchorprotocol.com/t/dynamic-anchor-earn-rate/3042/63 "2022-03-15T09:50:10Z")

</div>

I personally like the idea.

Perhaps a2UST could be created by staking aUST to a specific contract, thereby making it immovable, but with higher yield. I do think for a2UST there needs to be some form of capital controls (lockup periods, etc.), otherwise this can be easily circumvented by a different protocol minting a wrapped, transferable version of a2UST.

This could fit the demand for the 2 user types of Anchor, aUST positioned towards DeFi applications with composability in mind and a2UST facing towards regular depositors such as third-party applications (which they don’t need composability)

aUST yield would still need a degree of yield flexibility, for Anchor to fluidly react to long-term market changes. This can go hand-to-hand with the dynamic Anchor rate.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.anchorprotocol.com/t/dynamic-anchor-earn-rate/3042)._
